CALL US: (07) 3367 0999 | EMAIL US:

ATO warns of TBAR lodgement errors

With upcoming annual lodgement dates for Transfer Balance Account Reporting (TBAR), the ATO is alerting funds of common lodgement mistakes that could lead to delays and additional processing time.

The Transfer Balance Cap (TBC) is a $1.6 million cap on the total amount of superannuation benefits that a member can transfer into a tax-free retirement phase income stream. TBAR is used by SMSF trustees to report to the ATO any events that affect a member’s transfer balance. The information is used to record and track the member’s TBC and apply provisions if the member were to breach the cap.

Reports can be lodged both online or by paper forms. The electronic method is recommended by the ATO as human errors are common when using the paper form to report. These issues are often a failure to provide the fund’s ABN and failing to report the event type. When these errors occur, the form will be suspended for manual review and the ATO may need to contact funds in some cases to resolve any issues.

A TBAR must be lodged for the 2018-19 financial year if any member had a transfer balance account event occur in the last year, and if all members have a total super balance of $1 million. The due date for annual TBAR reporting is the same date as the SMSF annual return on 15 May 2019, although not all funds have the same lodgement due date. Trustees should familiarise themselves with their SMSF’s due dates and ensure they are reporting the correct information to avoid processing delays.

Business
advice

taxation
planning

compliance
services

News

Investing in shares vs property in SMSFs

March 19, 2020

Shares and property are two popular investment options for those with a self-managed super fund (SMSF). However, they both have very different attributes and choosing the one that will achieve the best outcome for an SMSF depends on your personal goals and situation.

While the price of shares can vary drastically, property is a relatively stable asset, making it appealing to those who want more security and predictability. Property prices are also negotiable unlike shares, and you can generally borrow money at a lower rate for property purchases.

It may seem hard to find the perfect investment property, but older and undercapitalised properties can be renovated for profit. However, returns from property rentals can be dented due to factors such as land tax, utilities and rates, maintenance and tenancy vacancies.

Shares are more dynamic and volatile than property. One advantage is the accessibility of investing in shares, as you can enter the share market with a few thousand dollars – much less than what you need to invest in a property.

Maintaining a portfolio of quality shares that pay tax-effective dividends may be a good way to fund retirement. With the right portfolio allocation, shares also have the potential to provide a better, stronger income than property rentals, as long as that income is sustainable and increasing.

Property can generally be used as a wealth-creation tool, while shares can create a reliable retirement income. For those who can afford to put more money into investments, it may be a good idea to consider investing and diversifying in both. If you’re unsure about which investment option is right for you, seeking financial advice may be the best option.