CALL US: (07) 3367 0999 | EMAIL US:

Fuel tax credit mistakes

Fuel tax credits are provided to businesses who acquire, manufacture, import or use fuel in part of running a business.

These credits can greatly benefit business owners but it is important to get the claim right. The ATO sees common mistakes made when calculating and claiming fuel tax credits, including:

Wrong calculations
A common error is to calculate fuel tax credits using the cost of the fuel rather than the quantity of fuel multiplied by the relevant rate. The correct formula is: quantity of eligible fuel x correct fuel tax credit rate = fuel tax credits.

Inaccurate records
You must keep accurate records of your fuel purchases and how the fuel is used in your business. If you claim less than $10,000 a year in fuel tax credits, you can use a range of documents to support your claims.

Using an incorrect rate
Fuel tax credit rates change every February. Check the rates before you lodge your BAS. The current rates for fuel acquired from 5 February 2018 to 30 June 2018 are as follows:

Eligible fuel type Unit Used in heavy vehicles for travelling on public roads All other business uses (including to power auxiliary equipment of a heavy vehicle)1
Liquid fuels, for example diesel or petrol cents per litre 15.1 40.9
Blended fuels: B5, B20, E10 cents per litre 15.1 40.9
Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) (duty paid) cents per litre 0.0 13.3
Liquefied natural gas (LNG) or compressed natural gas (CNG) (duty paid) cents per kilogram 0.0 28.0
Blended fuel: E85 cents per litre 0.0 10.725
B100 cents per litre 0.0 2.7

Not checking the activity
A common mistake is to claim fuel tax credits using the ‘other business uses’ rate for heavy vehicles travelling on public roads. Rates differ depending on the activity they are used for.

Ineligible fuels
Claiming fuel used for private purposes, or for travelling on a public road in vehicles with a gross vehicle mass (GVM) of 4.5 tonne or less is a common error. If you are unsure if about the eligibility of your fuel type and usage, contact one of our accountants today.

Business
advice

taxation
planning

compliance
services

News

Investing in shares vs property in SMSFs

March 19, 2020

Shares and property are two popular investment options for those with a self-managed super fund (SMSF). However, they both have very different attributes and choosing the one that will achieve the best outcome for an SMSF depends on your personal goals and situation.

While the price of shares can vary drastically, property is a relatively stable asset, making it appealing to those who want more security and predictability. Property prices are also negotiable unlike shares, and you can generally borrow money at a lower rate for property purchases.

It may seem hard to find the perfect investment property, but older and undercapitalised properties can be renovated for profit. However, returns from property rentals can be dented due to factors such as land tax, utilities and rates, maintenance and tenancy vacancies.

Shares are more dynamic and volatile than property. One advantage is the accessibility of investing in shares, as you can enter the share market with a few thousand dollars – much less than what you need to invest in a property.

Maintaining a portfolio of quality shares that pay tax-effective dividends may be a good way to fund retirement. With the right portfolio allocation, shares also have the potential to provide a better, stronger income than property rentals, as long as that income is sustainable and increasing.

Property can generally be used as a wealth-creation tool, while shares can create a reliable retirement income. For those who can afford to put more money into investments, it may be a good idea to consider investing and diversifying in both. If you’re unsure about which investment option is right for you, seeking financial advice may be the best option.